Landowners Appeal “Party Stutus”

Landowners in Bastrop and Lee counties who were recently denied the right to be heard in a contested case hearing are appealing the decision.  


The landowners had sought “party status” in the End Op contested case hearing being held before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH). This administrative decision has broad, significant implications throughout Texas for landowners wanting to protect the groundwater in place beneath their lands. Click here for decision

 

Four landowners, including Environmental Stewardship, petitioned Lost Pines Groundwater Conservation District for party status (legal standing and the right to legally participate) in a disputed groundwater pumping permit hearing involving End Op (a water marketer), Aqua Water Supply Corp., and the District.  The District asked that SOAH rule on the request.

 

The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the ownership of groundwater

in place  as real property in the recently-decided Day decision. This SOAH decision upholds the rule of capture without recourse. Contrary to the Day decision, this decision denies landowners the opportunity to participate in administrative proceedings concerning the depletion of their groundwater, except under the most narrowly defined conditions.

Click here for Supreme Court Decision

 

The Administrative Order strips landowners of their rights to protect their property.  The only entity that was given standing was Aqua, a water supply corporation with large well fields and pumping permits. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ruled that a landowner must “demonstrate ownership of wells or have plans to exercise their groundwater rights,” AND “must establish a specific injury to a personal justiciable interest” to have standing in a contested case hearing before a groundwater conservation district.

 

The action of this administrative order, if left to stand, will establish the conditions for party status in contested case hearings held before groundwater conservation districts throughout the state, and will severely limit the ability of landowners to protect their groundwater property rights by severely limiting their ability to argue the merits of their case.  Click here for an analysis of the decision 

 

The questions the landowners are posing to the Lost Pines Groundwater Conservation District’s Board in their appeal is this (in layman’s terms):  Does the ownership of real property above and within an aquifer (groundwater) where drawdown will potentially occur as the result of a groundwater permit allowing the pumping of tens of thousands of acre-feet of water per year constitute a legally protected, ownership interest that a landowner can defend against those who wish to pump away this property?

 

So we need your financial assistance

now more than ever before!

Unfortunately, the fact is, it takes money to be heard.  Environmental Stewardship, along with the landowners, will need to launch an all out effort to make persuasive legal arguments that resonate with the Lost Pines GCD Board of Directors and Administrative Law Judge.  This will require our legal teams to call expert witness to credibly tell our story.  Our legal teams will have to discredit the claims of End Op and its expert witnesses through cross-examination.  To be successful in cross-examination takes a great deal of preparation. 

 

 

THE STAKES ARE HIGH.  OUR WATER SUPPLY AND THE FUTURE

OF OUR REGION IS AT RISK. 

 

Just take a look at the draw-down maps in the left side bar below

 to see what water bankruptcy looks like visually on a groundwater map.

 

Please consider making a generous TAX DEDUCTIBLE

contribution today.

AND THANK YOU TO ALL OF YOU THAT HAVE MADE A PREVIOUS DONATION!

 Your ongoing support is needed and appreciated.

 

Click this link to DONATE NOW

 

or, as an option, consider making a donation to the newly formed 

Lost Pines Water Defense Fund

P.O. Box 690, Elgin, TX 78621

 For more information call 512-657-2089

1 Comment

  1. Steward

    To understand the full implications of the ALJ’s decision in denying standing, one needs to read the briefs that were presented by Environmental Stewardship, the Landowners and the opposing End Op attorneys. If interested, let me know and I can post these.

Comments are closed.